“The LAPD will perform an assessment of the systems' data security features and retention periods for ALPR images to evaluate the need for adjustment, prior to publishing of the ALPR policy,” the department wrote. In a brief response published along with the audit, the LAPD said it plans to finalize an ALPR plan by April. Wiener said he plans to introduce follow-up legislation to ensure law enforcement agencies are following the laws. Scott Wiener, who requested the audit, told Motherboard. This technology reportedly exists to help with parking enforcement and other basic law enforcement responsibilities, and yet we’re seeing a huge amount of data collected, retained, and shared unnecessarily,” state Sen. Meanwhile, the department has not established any written policy governing proper use of its ALPR data, in violation of a 2016 state law.Ĭiting a case in Georgia in which a police officer took a bribe to look up a woman’s license plate to determine if she was an undercover officer, the auditors also determined that many of the departments it examined were not ensuring that only authorized personnel had access to ALPR data, or auditing the database logs to make sure that authorized personnel were using the systems properly. The LAPD then adds other sensitive information to that database, sometimes tagging the photos with criminal records, names, addresses, and dates of birth. Only 400,000 of those generated immediate matches to cars of interest, but the remaining 99.9 percent of the images, which can be used to track peoples’ movement across the city, stay stored in a department database for more than five years, according to the audit. The Los Angeles Police Department, for example, has collected more than 320 million images over the last several years. But the California State Auditor’s office found that most of the data collected is on innocent people and their car movements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |